Evaluability AI

Evidence You Can Trust.
Not Just Scores.

The missing layer beneath AI evaluation

Evals tell you how good it is.

Evaluability tells you
whether you can rely on it.

Get the Book Read the Brief

The Book

Evaluable AI

R‑BED™

Evaluable AI

Risk-Based Evaluability Design (R‑BED)™:
Building Governable AI Systems

Vishal Srivastava, PhD
Tanmay Sah, PhD

A passing eval is a snapshot. Governance needs evidence that holds.

Risk-Based Evaluability Design (R-BED) is a framework for building AI systems that can be evaluated in proportion to the risk they carry — so that when someone asks “prove it,” the proof exists.

Why quality scores alone cannot support governance, audit, or regulatory decisions

How to design systems whose evidence is reproducible, traceable, and defensible over time

A risk-tiered approach: matching the depth of evaluability to the stakes of the decision

The Position Paper

Evaluability: The Framework

Governance runs on evidence, not scores. This position paper introduces evaluability — the capacity to produce and validate decision-ready evidence for AI governance — and the principle that reorganizes everything downstream: evidence is never sufficient in the abstract, only relative to the decision it must support.

Read the Whitepaper →

Foundations of Evaluable AI • Version 1.0 • 2026

Vol. 1 • Foundational Essay Series

THE AI EVALUABILITY BRIEF

Evidence you can trust. Not just scores.

Issue 1 — July 2026

Foundational Essay

The Missing Layer Beneath AI Evaluation

A passing score is a snapshot. Governance runs on evidence that survives scrutiny and time. Issue 1 defines evaluability — and why the score may pass today, but the evidence must hold tomorrow.

Read Issue 1 →

Get every issue

One essay per issue on evaluability, decision-grade AI evidence, and governing AI systems you can actually rely on. No noise.

By Vishal Srivastava, PhD

The People

Founder

Founder • Evaluability AI

Vishal Srivastava, PhD

Founder of Evaluability AI, creator of Risk-Based Evaluability Design, and author of The AI Evaluability Brief. Writes on AI governance, decision-grade evidence, and building systems institutions can actually rely on.